Inflation Topic

Posted by DougOut on 2/13/2022 2:33:00 PM (view original):
Well, my understanding, or interpretation, which is not specifically represented on this graph, would be the impact of fracking. My memory is some RED states, with the resource, used it, except on SOME Federal owned land which was off limits to ALL 50 STATES due to Federal law while some BLUE states with majority democrat legislators and governors, restricted fracking within their respective states. New York and Pennsylvania would be an example.

Since then I think Biden passed an ExO of use on virtually ALL Federal lands.

Remember when Biden passed 41 executive orders? That was Jan. 20th. Remember when he shut down the XL pipeline? Check this out:
01/20/2021 Environment Executive Order Yes

Cancels the Keystone XL pipeline and directs agencies to review and reverse more than 100 Trump actions on the environment


Notice the second highlighted line that reversed MORE THAN 100 Trump actions (read policy) on the environment. This spans mineral rights to oil and gas.

Would you care to speculate that particular executive order at the very least might be affecting current energy production and fuel prices?
Nope. Nothing Trump did decreased gas prices and nothing Biden did increased them.

Again, the rate of change of net imports didn't change at all under Trump and started to reverse before Biden took office. The problem is that the pandemic caused oil producers to decrease production. That's it.
2/13/2022 2:44 PM
Posted by DougOut on 2/13/2022 12:24:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Uofa2 on 2/13/2022 12:38:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 2/12/2022 11:42:00 PM (view original):
fyi, I think Biden is actually bad for continuing Trump's border policies. I don't like how this conversation presupposes that Trump immigration policy = good

It is very telling and typical of Doug to not be able to name a SINGLE policy or thing Biden did to increase immigration or increase gas prices.

The go-to answer is always the Keystone pipeline, which was so ridiculously inefficient that no private entity wanted to sponsor it and employed about a dozen people full-time, and also wasn't even completed at the time of its cancellation so ending the pipeline had zero effect on production.

Doug won't respond to this btw. He'll post some random conservative meme or a snarky quip that doesn't address the point to dodge the fact that he's just wrong about basically everything. This is how most conservatives are: They're wrong and don't care that they're wrong.
100% agree re: Biden’s border policies. I’m not the biggest fan, though he’s made some cosmetic changes that are good. But overall, nah, it’s not that much change from Trump.

Its just ******* hilarious that he’s doing a better job of it, just like Obama did, as bag said, and the right wingers won’t acknowledge it. So clearly it’s not policy they actually have a problem with.

Obviously you’re correct about the keystone pipeline as well.

How did the Donald J. Trump administration handle migrant flows?

For the last four years, U.S. immigration policy focused almost solely on stopping migrants from coming to; entering; or, if they reached the United States, staying in the country. The Trump administration forced Central American countries to sign “safe third country” agreements, which require asylum seekers to first seek refuge in neighboring countries before applying in the United States. It also narrowed the interpretation of what constitutes grounds for asylum, largely excluding the domestic or gang violence that so many flee. And it drastically lowered the annual U.S. cap on refugees from over one hundred thousand to just fifteen thousand.

For those migrants who did make it to the border, the Trump administration processed them. Later, it sent those waiting for their claims to be adjudicated back to Mexico under the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), also known as the Remain in Mexico policy. The Mexican government, for its part, agreed to hold these tens of thousands of migrants indefinitely.

What is Joe Biden’s approach?

The Biden administration’s approach differs in that it looks to both manage the migrant flows and to change the situations on the ground that force people to leave their home countries. In his first weeks in office, Biden ended construction of the wall along the U.S. southern border and canceled the safe third country agreements with Northern Triangle countries. He is allowing some twenty-five thousand asylum seekers currently in Mexico under the MPP to enter the United States as they await a decision. On the campaign trail, Biden promised to invest $4 billion over his first term to address the root causes of migration, including through programs in Central American countries to reduce and prevent violence, help farmers set up irrigation systems or change crops, and create economic opportunities.

ALSO:

NEW INSIGHTS

President Joe Biden recently lifted travel restrictions on “primarily Muslim” countries that were put in place by the Trump administration—but there’s been a lot of misinformation about Trump’s restrictions. After an extensive and in-depth review of all threats posed by individuals from foreign countries by the DHS and the State Department, the President [initially] restricted entry from eight countries; Chad (later removed from the list), Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen, that were state sponsors of terrorism, provided safe havens for terrorists, or provided insufficient information to U.S. authorities. Chief Justice John Roberts said that Trump “undoubtedly fulfilled” the requirement in the statute that he determine if the entry of covered aliens would be “detrimental” to the interests of the country and our national security.
So we asked for policy changes and you gave:

-He stopped the wall that wasn't even close to being finished from being constructed
-He follows the international law on asylum processes
-He tries to address the root causes of immigration to reduce it
-He ended the muslim ban

Is this supposed to be what caused the massive immigration influx?
2/13/2022 2:46 PM
No. Given that nothing was actually flowing through the Keystone XL pipeline, there is absolutely no chance that shutting down the Keystone XL pipeline PROJECT changed the price of fuel. It carried no oil under the Trump administration, it carries no oil now. Exactly the same. The other components here have either been insignificant or have not yet led to any actual policy changes. So again, no, there is no chance it is affecting current energy production and prices. Every economic analysis I've ever seen on this clearly indicates that supply issues resulting from the pandemic caused the shortages.

Moreover, looking back at the graph, there is no inflection point in US energy importation during the Biden administration. Rising prices are part of a global trend resulting from global reductions in oil production. The inflection point where the US stopped improving its net energy import/export ratio was in 2020, during the Trump administration. Giving Trump credit for happening to be in office during the best point and presiding over the inflection point is like giving Hoover credit for being in office for a 25-year high in market prices. Nobody does that. They criticize Hoover and Coolidge for presiding over the rampant market speculation that A) led to this high and B) resulted in the massive crash that caused the Great Depression. Happening to be in office when it hit its high point wasn't a result of good governance, it was a result of bad governance. Their policies caused, or at least contributed to, the inflection point. Trump presided over the inflection point at which US net energy exports stopped increasing. This is not to his credit.

As I said the first time, I don't think this is Trump's fault. What changed that altered the trends was the overall global economic situation. It was covid's fault. But I don't think it makes sense to give Trump any credit for being the guy in charge when trends changed for the worse.
2/13/2022 3:03 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Or, put more simply, you can't blame Biden for gas prices being up about 50% since his inauguration when the global price of crude oil is up about 80% in the same period.

Gas prices are up in the EU, they're up in the UK, they're up in Mexico, they're up in Canada, they're up in Brazil, they're up in Australia, they're up in New Zealand, they're up in South Africa, they're up in Japan, etc. Those things are not Biden's fault. There was a global decline in oil production as a result of the pandemic. It affected EVERY developed nation. The United States is a developed nation.
2/13/2022 3:06 PM
lol

Hey doug, can you give a single economist that credits the rising gas prices to Biden cancelling the pipeline and not to the pandemic?
2/13/2022 3:07 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 2/13/2022 3:03:00 PM (view original):
No. Given that nothing was actually flowing through the Keystone XL pipeline, there is absolutely no chance that shutting down the Keystone XL pipeline PROJECT changed the price of fuel. It carried no oil under the Trump administration, it carries no oil now. Exactly the same. The other components here have either been insignificant or have not yet led to any actual policy changes. So again, no, there is no chance it is affecting current energy production and prices. Every economic analysis I've ever seen on this clearly indicates that supply issues resulting from the pandemic caused the shortages.

Moreover, looking back at the graph, there is no inflection point in US energy importation during the Biden administration. Rising prices are part of a global trend resulting from global reductions in oil production. The inflection point where the US stopped improving its net energy import/export ratio was in 2020, during the Trump administration. Giving Trump credit for happening to be in office during the best point and presiding over the inflection point is like giving Hoover credit for being in office for a 25-year high in market prices. Nobody does that. They criticize Hoover and Coolidge for presiding over the rampant market speculation that A) led to this high and B) resulted in the massive crash that caused the Great Depression. Happening to be in office when it hit its high point wasn't a result of good governance, it was a result of bad governance. Their policies caused, or at least contributed to, the inflection point. Trump presided over the inflection point at which US net energy exports stopped increasing. This is not to his credit.

As I said the first time, I don't think this is Trump's fault. What changed that altered the trends was the overall global economic situation. It was covid's fault. But I don't think it makes sense to give Trump any credit for being the guy in charge when trends changed for the worse.
Oh there you are.

I didn't say anything about the XL pipeline. I pointed to the OVER 100 policy changes that were made due to the Biden executive order. That had to have had some impact over the past year.

That's a pretty graph but I would like to see some hard numbers on total US energy production (thru this past December) over the last 4 years broken down into oil from drilling versus fracking and other means of energy production. I'll look around for something like that.

Thanks for not blaming Trump and I respect the many factors involved in the cost of energy BUT he did make it easier and cheaper to get said energy through deregulation and other means AND although he's probably not the majority factor in the drop of energy prices since the end of the Obama Presidency, He did make a HUGE difference of the price at the pump due to his policy. I'll go along to a point that some of the increase in price is due to covid BUT both Biden and Trump had a year with the problem.

I'll take it one farther, and this is simply opinion. If Trump were still President, we'ed be in a much better position on many different fronts. And gas would be cheaper.
2/13/2022 3:25 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 2/13/2022 3:06:00 PM (view original):
Or, put more simply, you can't blame Biden for gas prices being up about 50% since his inauguration when the global price of crude oil is up about 80% in the same period.

Gas prices are up in the EU, they're up in the UK, they're up in Mexico, they're up in Canada, they're up in Brazil, they're up in Australia, they're up in New Zealand, they're up in South Africa, they're up in Japan, etc. Those things are not Biden's fault. There was a global decline in oil production as a result of the pandemic. It affected EVERY developed nation. The United States is a developed nation.
True. And our not maxing out production during the crisis has not helped matters. Biden released a few drops from the reserves and prices dropped temporarily. It's simple common sense the more we and the world produce, the lower the price will be.
2/13/2022 3:29 PM
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-oil-producers-ramp-up-fracking-sign-stronger-output-gains-2022-01-12/
2/13/2022 4:10 PM
Simple fact-check shows that gas prices actually rose throughout most of the Trump admin and fell throughout most of the Obama admin. They hit a huge low in 2020 because of a decrease in demand and started going up before Biden took office.

2/13/2022 4:33 PM

That's a pretty graph but I would like to see some hard numbers on total US energy production (thru this past December) over the last 4 years broken down into oil from drilling versus fracking and other means of energy production. I'll look around for something like that.

Why would this matter? All you need is a chart of net imports - that's what you mean when you say "energy independence."

2/13/2022 4:35 PM
This place is dead. It's only me and dahs. Here's an interesting little something I came across:
John Durham Drops a 'Shock and Awe' Filing About Spying on Donald Trump
2/13/2022 4:48 PM
Hmmmm...... Here's another one.

CLINTON'S CONSPIRACY

2/13/2022 4:53 PM
And another one! I think somethings going on......

Durham Report: Clinton Campaign Paid to 'Infiltrate' White House


A filing from Justice Department special counsel John Durham says Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" Trump Tower servers, and later the White House, Fox News reports.... [Full Story]
Related Stories
2/13/2022 4:56 PM
◂ Prev 1...22|23|24|25|26...51 Next ▸
Inflation Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.