Inflation Topic

Uofa2
Posts: 4380 (2)
Hall of Famer
113 208 8
All Star
Only if you don’t understand DNS and Infosec. DNS traffic records are lookups and responses. They are not confidential. There's no "infiltrating" going on here. In fact, Joffe's company (Neustar) ran a huge DNS resolver. DNS servers and load balancers change DNS information, or return different answers to the same query, all the time. This is normal behavior, just to head off the "queries were changed" BS.

Infosec monitors DNS lookups all the time for evidence of attempted attacks and misuse. There's nothing unusual about that. This is basic data mining and aggregation. DNS monitoring as a service is a very popular business; a large number of companies engage with it as part of their infosec activities. Joffe's company was hired to monitor DNS traffic as part of a contract, and had been doing so for the government since at least 2014. This is legal.

Neustar had multiple contracts with the federal government, including one to provide DNS service. It's right there in Durham's statement. Together with its other business, it had the data, so no "spying." Neustar also provided researchers with DNS data that allowed them to map internet trends and look for malicious activity, among other things. These researchers found multiple mysterious lookups between Trump/Alfa/Spectrum Health.

So: the DNS information (lookups/responses) from the Trump Tower server indicated some weird behavior. There's probably nothing there, but it was pretty strange, and has not been explained. Joffe gave this information to Sussmann, his lawyer, who gave it to the FBI (or CIA, depending on the story). This was after Sussmann stopped representing the DNC. All of this came out last fall. Durham is trying to create a narrative that this indicates Sussmann's guilt of something or other, but he has produced little evidence of this. To try and demonstrate this, Durham conducted the same data analysis he says proves Sussmann's guilt, but against the Obama WH (2014).

Oh, and everyone just sat on this for five years until the SOL expired. It's all just so dumb. And this has been out there in the press since at least October, 2016, and in the Infosec community before that.

congrats on falling for the shiny object once again, you mark
2/13/2022 8:10 PM
lostnfound74
Posts: 6336 (0)
Hall of Famer
532
Prospect
Hilary is evil. Period
2/13/2022 9:30 PM
tangplay
Posts: 12141 (0)
Pro
18 1 1
Veteran
not to mention Doug pivoting off the gas prices stuff when it becomes incredibly evident that he doesn't know what he's talking about

Very predictable
2/13/2022 10:12 PM
DougOut
Posts: 44717 (0)
Hall of Famer
127
Prospect
Posted by lostnfound74 on 2/13/2022 9:30:00 PM (view original):
Hilary is evil. Period
Yes, and since I've proven my points on gas prices, immigration and inflation (all 3 are UP^) let's take a little break and see what the criminals in charge are up to:

Durham claims Clinton campaign paid tech company to hack Trump residence and the White House, too
KAREN TOWNSEND Feb 13, 2022 11:01 AM ET
2/13/2022 10:36 PM
lostnfound74
Posts: 6336 (0)
Hall of Famer
532
Prospect
Posted by tangplay on 2/13/2022 10:12:00 PM (view original):
not to mention Doug pivoting off the gas prices stuff when it becomes incredibly evident that he doesn't know what he's talking about

Very predictable
Whatever. Gas in BC is now $1.80 a liter.. That's $1.35 U$ or $8.10 for a Canadian Gallon, or $6.15 u$ cut the lie however you like. Albertans have it much better, and they deserve the break cuz they are the smartest Province in Canada BC and Quebec are the dumbest
2/14/2022 12:58 AM
laramiebob
Posts: 7499 (0)
Hall of Famer
164 1
Prospect
Man, are you prone to baseless, impulse based hatred of political personalities (and any other folks) you don't agree with or understand.
Why can't you understand that your (A Canadian!) OPINIONS on U.S. Politics and U.S. political issues mean absolutely NOTHING to any real American voters??

It's quite apparent how ignorant and devoid of basic understanding you ARE about U.S. politics.
Find another topic to rage about...............

Or go elsewhere to post your meaningless hatred and drivel.
2/14/2022 7:42 AM
tangplay
Posts: 12141 (0)
Pro
18 1 1
Veteran
Also, everyone knows how expensive gas is. What's being debated is the cause.
2/14/2022 11:38 AM
Uofa2
Posts: 4380 (2)
Hall of Famer
113 208 8
All Star
Posted by tangplay on 2/13/2022 10:12:00 PM (view original):
not to mention Doug pivoting off the gas prices stuff when it becomes incredibly evident that he doesn't know what he's talking about

Very predictable
Every time

he doesn’t even realize he’s wrong about the Durham thing too, of course. Statue of Limitations, Doug. Durham released this **** for you to froth over two days after the SOL ran out.
2/14/2022 12:25 PM
DougOut
Posts: 44717 (0)
Hall of Famer
127
Prospect
Posted by Uofa2 on 2/14/2022 12:27:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 2/13/2022 10:12:00 PM (view original):
not to mention Doug pivoting off the gas prices stuff when it becomes incredibly evident that he doesn't know what he's talking about

Very predictable
Every time

he doesn’t even realize he’s wrong about the Durham thing too, of course. Statue of Limitations, Doug. Durham released this **** for you to froth over two days after the SOL ran out.
Oh really. For whom did they run out?
2/14/2022 1:27 PM
Uofa2
Posts: 4380 (2)
Hall of Famer
113 208 8
All Star
Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer wonders if the Durham filing's mention of "infiltrate" means there was "hacking" of computers, only for John Ratcliffe to admit that this was actually "lawful access into government servers" by the tech company involved.

It should be pointed out that the Durham filing itself doesn't say that the Clinton campaign tried to "infiltrate" Trump's servers. That instead comes Fox News' interview with Kash Patel on the filing -- and is only noted at the very bottom of the piece.
2/14/2022 4:44 PM
Uofa2
Posts: 4380 (2)
Hall of Famer
113 208 8
All Star

Michael Sussmann has filed his response to John Durham’s transparent attempt to inflame the frothers. In it, he notes Durham used an unrelated filing (one that, Sussmann’s filing noted, had already been addressed between the parties) to make claims that were not charged.

Importantly, he notes that Durham misrepresented the dates of the anomalous data found at the Executive Office of the Presidency that Sussmann presented at a February 9, 2017 meeting with the CIA. The data predates the Donald Trump inauguration.

Sussmann has asked Judge Christopher Cooper to strike the improper language from the motion.

He has also provided yet more evidence that Durham didn’t take basic investigative steps necessary to vet the allegations he made in the indictment before actually indicting Sussmann. Durham didn’t interview any Clinton Campaign staffer to find out whether Sussmann coordinated with the campaign until after the indictment.

Durham had to admit that he had no basis to substantiate claims of coordination with the Hillary Campaign in a filing last year. But that was October. It was not until after he had to confess he had overblown that claim in the indictment that Durham first interviewed a Hillary staffer.

In his filing, Sussmann makes it clear he intends to move to dismiss the indictment.

If he keeps to the original filing deadline, that motion will be submitted this Friday. While not normally a basis to dismiss an indictment, Sussmann will be able to present entire swaths of proof that Durham didn’t take basic investigative steps before accusing Sussmann of things that turned out not to be true.

And now he’ll be able to point back to this filing to show that Durham misrepresented basic facts.

but seriously, great job, good effort Durham

2/15/2022 9:25 AM
lostnfound74
Posts: 6336 (0)
Hall of Famer
532
Prospect
Posted by laramiebob on 2/14/2022 7:42:00 AM (view original):
Man, are you prone to baseless, impulse based hatred of political personalities (and any other folks) you don't agree with or understand.
Why can't you understand that your (A Canadian!) OPINIONS on U.S. Politics and U.S. political issues mean absolutely NOTHING to any real American voters??

It's quite apparent how ignorant and devoid of basic understanding you ARE about U.S. politics.
Find another topic to rage about...............

Or go elsewhere to post your meaningless hatred and drivel.
If there was accuracy in your comments here, I would fight you... but nobody can tell you anything, cuz you know it all.

To understand US politics is very simple.. It is clearly LW ego vs RW ego (Rep vs Dem) and the lefties are largely the children of the devil, and have been blinded to truth

and I don't attack Biden, in case you have never noticed

American voters are dumb, but not as dumb as Canadian voters.

Finally, you do not have the authority to tell me where to go. So show me hatred.. Mine vs yours. It is a 1:10 ratio

and you are the ten
2/16/2022 1:24 AM
rsp777
Posts: 13466 (0)
Hall of Famer
355 3
Prospect
The Canadian, Trump-supporting Zealot guy actually said (devoid of irony)

“and the lefties are largely the children of the devil, and have been blinded to truth”



Meanwhile…in REALITY

Trump’s false or misleading claims total 30,573 over 4 years

2/16/2022 2:22 AM (edited)
tangplay
Posts: 12141 (0)
Pro
18 1 1
Veteran
But just like the polls, those are probably fake lmao

Does lnf think the pollsters are just picking numbers out of a hat when surveyed about the Canadian Truckers?

Does he know what % of Canadians are vaccinated?
2/16/2022 3:00 AM
lostnfound74
Posts: 6336 (0)
Hall of Famer
532
Prospect
Posted by tangplay on 2/16/2022 3:00:00 AM (view original):
But just like the polls, those are probably fake lmao

Does lnf think the pollsters are just picking numbers out of a hat when surveyed about the Canadian Truckers?

Does he know what % of Canadians are vaccinated?
Scarlett; I really don't give a damn
2/16/2022 6:55 AM
◂ Prev 1...23|24|25|26|27...51 Next ▸
Inflation Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.