Posted by all3 on 7/4/2020 9:07:00 AM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 7/3/2020 2:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/3/2020 2:17:00 PM (view original):
Also, how much of a snowflake do you have to be to respond to someone saying "that rich socialite looks high" with "OMG THE HATRED, WHY???"

that is all3's MO. If someone says anything even slightly negative about Trump, they are a Trump hater.

Making unfounded accusations of being high is being "even slightly negative"? GTF outa here.

Everyone enjoy your 4th and be safe. Maybe today will remind some of you what this Country once was and still should be.

We're not the ones who need reminding.

The 4th is the most overrated holiday. No one actually "celebrates America" today, we just shoot off fireworks and get drunk.

Millions of Bucks literally "up in smoke" in (mostly) false displays of Patriotism. The Chinese LOVE IT!
Stupid Americans!

Posted by laramiebob on 7/4/2020 11:41:00 AM (view original):
Millions of Bucks literally "up in smoke" in (mostly) false displays of Patriotism. The Chinese LOVE IT!
Stupid Americans!

China loves the thought of a Biden presidency a lot more. They've got their pants half-way down already, in anticipation of Biden continuing to kiss their azz. Wonder how many more jobs he'll send over there if elected. Stupid Americans!

Breaking news: All3 comes out in support of protectionism.

In other news, all3 now hates capitalism

Posted by all3 on 7/4/2020 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 7/4/2020 11:41:00 AM (view original):
Millions of Bucks literally "up in smoke" in (mostly) false displays of Patriotism. The Chinese LOVE IT!
Stupid Americans!

China loves the thought of a Biden presidency a lot more. They've got their pants half-way down already, in anticipation of Biden continuing to kiss their azz. Wonder how many more jobs he'll send over there if elected. Stupid Americans!

so? Even if it is true, how is that different from your boy, Donald? He kisses Russia's *** along with North Korea and probably China too.

Posted by all3 on 7/4/2020 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 7/4/2020 11:41:00 AM (view original):
Millions of Bucks literally "up in smoke" in (mostly) false displays of Patriotism. The Chinese LOVE IT!
Stupid Americans!

China loves the thought of a Biden presidency a lot more. They've got their pants half-way down already, in anticipation of Biden continuing to kiss their azz. Wonder how many more jobs he'll send over there if elected. Stupid Americans!

.....so, literally, you just believe everything trump says and never bother looking behind the curtain, huh?

The numbers and Biden's voting history seem pretty clear, but you can certainly try to convince me what I said isn't true.

Take the $250 billion in deals announced during Trump’s visit to China in November. Many of the agreements were nonbinding memorandums of understanding, and some had already been negotiated. And while they made a nice headline, they did nothing to address the fundamental problems that U.S. companies face in China: requirements to share technological trade secrets with Chinese partners in exchange for access to Chinese markets; restrictions on entering huge swathes of the economy; industrial policies that explicitly aim to oust foreign firms in fields ranging from information technology to electric vehicles.

Posted by wylie715 on 7/4/2020 1:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/4/2020 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 7/4/2020 11:41:00 AM (view original):
Millions of Bucks literally "up in smoke" in (mostly) false displays of Patriotism. The Chinese LOVE IT!
Stupid Americans!

China loves the thought of a Biden presidency a lot more. They've got their pants half-way down already, in anticipation of Biden continuing to kiss their azz. Wonder how many more jobs he'll send over there if elected. Stupid Americans!

so? Even if it is true, how is that different from your boy, Donald? He kisses Russia's *** along with North Korea and probably China too.

That last sentence prooves you're obviously not interested in facts.

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/4/2020 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Take the $250 billion in deals announced during Trump’s visit to China in November. Many of the agreements were nonbinding memorandums of understanding, and some had already been negotiated. And while they made a nice headline, they did nothing to address the fundamental problems that U.S. companies face in China: requirements to share technological trade secrets with Chinese partners in exchange for access to Chinese markets; restrictions on entering huge swathes of the economy; industrial policies that explicitly aim to oust foreign firms in fields ranging from information technology to electric vehicles.

And when were those requirements and restrictions put in place? (Seems like you just made my arguement instead of yours.)

Posted by all3 on 7/4/2020 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/4/2020 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Take the $250 billion in deals announced during Trump’s visit to China in November. Many of the agreements were nonbinding memorandums of understanding, and some had already been negotiated. And while they made a nice headline, they did nothing to address the fundamental problems that U.S. companies face in China: requirements to share technological trade secrets with Chinese partners in exchange for access to Chinese markets; restrictions on entering huge swathes of the economy; industrial policies that explicitly aim to oust foreign firms in fields ranging from information technology to electric vehicles.

And when were those requirements and restrictions put in place? (Seems like you just made my arguement instead of yours.)

Oh man, it’s almost like there should have been some type of agreement of trade plan with other countries in Asia to counteract China’s dominance. What could we call it though?

Oxford Economics and Moody’s Analytics calculate that the U.S.-China trade war shaved 0.3 percent off growth — the equivalent of $65 billion — last year. And that is likely to grow to $85 billion in 2020, according to Gregory Daco of Oxford Economics, since this deal does not end the trade war. Tariffs will remain on nearly two-thirds of Chinese imports. Given all of this, economists say this trade conflict has been a net loss to the economy.

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/4/2020 2:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/4/2020 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/4/2020 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Take the $250 billion in deals announced during Trump’s visit to China in November. Many of the agreements were nonbinding memorandums of understanding, and some had already been negotiated. And while they made a nice headline, they did nothing to address the fundamental problems that U.S. companies face in China: requirements to share technological trade secrets with Chinese partners in exchange for access to Chinese markets; restrictions on entering huge swathes of the economy; industrial policies that explicitly aim to oust foreign firms in fields ranging from information technology to electric vehicles.

And when were those requirements and restrictions put in place? (Seems like you just made my arguement instead of yours.)

Oh man, it’s almost like there should have been some type of agreement of trade plan with other countries in Asia to counteract China’s dominance. What could we call it though?

President Trump may have committed his biggest strategic blunder vis a vis China during his first full week in office, when, with a quick signature, he withdrew the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, says top China expert Christopher Johnson.

"The TPP was the way to get China to address a lot of what we're now trying to get them to address with tariffs," said Johnson, who was for years a senior China analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency, and who now holds the Freeman Chair in China Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"It may be the biggest strategic mistake the United States has ever made," he said.

In an interview with Intelligence Matters host and CBS senior national security contributor Michael Morell, Johnson said senior Chinese officials were actively discussing opening up market access when they learned Japan was serious about TPP. "And then it went away in a moment," he said. "And that's why they have not moved forward in the ensuing couple of years."